Post Mid-term election, pre – Christmas shopping and slower ACA enrollments all make for Blah-blah-blah misleading headlines. Don’t go to sleep!

Every day we see media headlines either boasting of the ACA successes or lamenting its failure and criticizing President Trump for the horrible performance. In fact the only people benefiting from the ACA seem to be the big Insurers but I’ll cover that another time.

Several stories over the past 10 days have skirted around the projected lower enrollment numbers on the ACA public plans. Last week those headlines landed on 800,000 fewer people will be insured “because of President Trump” of course. But the media takes it further. It also projects, based on “expert accounts” that there will be 247,000 fewer children insured and again because of the Trump administration.

Now, why would there be fewer children covered. That makes no sense.

I want to address these two issues because it seems impossible to believe. I expect the enrollment numbers in the ACA to be lower but the rational put forward for the results is too partisan, for me.

One complaint is that the Trump administration cut Federal funds that had been going toward the marketing and sales of the ACA’s IFPs (Individual & Family Plans). But, really?

That sounds fishy to me for a couple of reasons:

  • Is it possible that there is anyone in America who does no know about the ACA. Sure, a person may have been neglectful the past 7 years so they don’t know how to access the plans.
  • But, there is no provider or hospital location in America that does not have an ACA or Public Exchange placard hanging with in feet of every provider’s office.
  • If citizens are unaware of the ACA then how do they know about other welfare benefits like free phones, food stamps, etc..
  • But realistically, is it possible that the members on ACA IFPs last year would give up their plans this year? Since 90% of the enrollees get either premium or benefit subsidy, or both, why would these folks not continue their plans since they are immune to the premium increases we all pay.

One plausible answer is the increase number of Americans who are now employed and therefore receiving Employer sponsored plans. If fact any other reasons sound nuts.

So, the moral of this story is that the advocates for the ACA, including the Media, have a biased interest in projecting and proclaiming any mis-fact or un-truth which can harm the President or even move toward Single payer, yuck.

Once again we can see that to be informed means we must use our own common sense and not believe every thing we see or hear.

We’re all in this together so until next week.

Mark Reynolds, RHU
559-250-2000
mark@reynolds.wtf
It means “Walk the Faith”.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: